[
  {
    "concept": "Special Relativity (Lorentz Invariance)",
    "coordinate": "Σ421₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.92,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "causality",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → concept destroyed (IS the relation between frames)",
    "dimension_rationale": "Cannot formulate without time (Lorentz boosts are temporal rotations)",
    "tensions": "Could be constraint-level if generalized to Poincaré invariance"
  },
  {
    "concept": "General Relativity (Einstein Field Equations)",
    "coordinate": "Σ423₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.88,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 3,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "narrative",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → concept destroyed (IS the relation geometry↔matter)",
    "dimension_rationale": "EFE describe spacetime evolution with matter content",
    "complexity_rationale": "X=3: genuine synthesis of geometry + matter-energy (independent frameworks)",
    "tensions": "First occupant of Σ₄₂₃₊ cell. X=3 vs X=1 tension: Riemann geometry was already about physical space (pro X=1), but pre-Einstein geometry and gravitational physics had distinct methods/objects/communities (pro X=3). Analogy: E=mc² maps X=1 as identity — if GR is geometry≡gravity, should be X=1? Counterargument: GR requires full tensor apparatus + action principle, richer than simple identity. Resolution: X=3 maintained, margin: TIGHT. If X=1 → would remap to Σ₄₂₁₊ (causality), joining relativistic cluster."
  },
  {
    "concept": "Equivalence Principle",
    "coordinate": "Σ421₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.91,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "causality",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → equivalence gone. Oscillation Δ/⇄ resolved: presupposes Δ, asserts ⇄",
    "dimension_rationale": "Acceleration (d²x/dt²) requires temporal content",
    "tensions": "Δ/⇄ oscillation, resolved via §3.2 Step 1, margin: clear"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Spacetime Interval (Minkowski Metric)",
    "coordinate": "Σ421₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.93,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "causality",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → ds² collapses (IS the relation dt↔dx). Δ/⇄ oscillation resolved to ⇄",
    "dimension_rationale": "dt² is constitutive of the metric — temporal content essential",
    "tensions": "Δ/⇄ oscillation (classifies timelike/spacelike vs unifies space+time), resolved to ⇄"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Geodesic Equation",
    "coordinate": "Σ431₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.94,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 3,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "genesis",
    "attribute_dominant": "⟳",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⟳ → trajectory/evolution destroyed. Geodesic IS a dynamical process",
    "dimension_rationale": "Describes evolution along worldlines — temporal content essential",
    "tensions": "None — clean mapping. Joins Schrödinger/Maxwell/Friedmann in equations-of-motion cluster"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Schwarzschild Solution (Black Holes)",
    "coordinate": "Σ311₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.95,
    "D": 3,
    "A": 1,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "excavation",
    "attribute_dominant": "Δ",
    "elimination_test": "Remove Δ → event horizon distinction collapses → concept destroyed",
    "dimension_rationale": "Static solution — volumetric spatial structure around mass (D=3 not D=4)",
    "tensions": "Strongest archetype resonance in batch — 'excavation' perfect for black holes"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Cosmological Redshift (Hubble's Law)",
    "coordinate": "Σ321₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.92,
    "D": 3,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "architecture",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → velocity-distance relation gone → concept destroyed",
    "dimension_rationale": "v=H₀d is a spatial relation at a given time — volumetric content (D=3)",
    "tensions": "Law (D=3) vs phenomenon (D=4) — mapped the law as stated"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Friedmann Equations",
    "coordinate": "Σ431₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.94,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 3,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "genesis",
    "attribute_dominant": "⟳",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⟳ → ȧ meaningless, dynamical evolution collapses → concept destroyed",
    "dimension_rationale": "ȧ/a = da/dt — temporal derivative IS the content",
    "tensions": "None — clean mapping. 'Genesis' archetype resonates strongly with cosmic evolution"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Time Dilation",
    "coordinate": "Σ411₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.91,
    "D": 4,
    "A": 1,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "instant",
    "attribute_dominant": "Δ",
    "elimination_test": "Remove Δ → no distinction between temporal rates → concept destroyed. Oscillation Δ/⇄ resolved: presupposes ⇄ (comparing clocks), asserts Δ (they differ)",
    "dimension_rationale": "Concept IS about time — temporal content constitutive",
    "tensions": "Δ/⇄ oscillation resolved via §3.2 Step 1 — asserts distinction, margin: clear"
  },
  {
    "concept": "Mass-Energy Equivalence (E=mc²)",
    "coordinate": "Σ121₊",
    "category": "node",
    "status": "UNCERTAIN",
    "confidence": 0.93,
    "D": 1,
    "A": 2,
    "X": 1,
    "P": "+",
    "archetype": "concatenation",
    "attribute_dominant": "⇄",
    "elimination_test": "Remove ⇄ → equivalence between mass and energy gone → concept destroyed",
    "dimension_rationale": "E=mc² holds without time (rest energy) and without space (point particle) — foundational identity (D=1)",
    "tensions": "None — clean mapping. Joins universal 'conservation/equivalence' cluster"
  }
]